Welcome to the AREEA Member Portal

Login

Register

Is your company a member of AREEA?  Register now to access the Member Portal

Welcome to the AREEA Member Portal

News, information and resources in one location for your access to ongoing support.

From fact sheets, guides and reference libraries to breaking news, the portal is your comprehensive and exclusive reference tool.

‘Farcical’ individual flexibility arrangements examined at NSW IR Society lunch

Providing Influence and Industry Advocacy since 1918

Contact AREEA to find out more. When it comes to workforce & workplace relations advocacy, AREEA is right there with you.

T: 1800 627 771
E: [email protected]

NEW South Wales’ top workplace relations professionals were today told of the ineffectiveness of the Fair Work Act’s individual flexibility arrangements (IFAs) and the key impacts the farcical provisions have on Australia’s resource industry employers.

In a presentation to the Industrial Relations Society of NSW, AREEA’s senior workplace policy adviser Lisa Matthews said the ineffectiveness of IFAs was in need of urgent reform.

With the findings of Fair Work Australia’s review into the operation of IFAs yet to be handed down, Ms Matthews explained some of the reasons behind the low take-up of these options in mining, oil and gas workplaces.

“IFAs were the Labor Government’s answer to (the Howard Government’s) Australian Workplace Agreements (AWA’s) but the take-up of IFAs is extremely low in our industry, even among those employers that have negotiated Fair Work Act agreements,” Ms Matthews said.

“The resource industry has never used AWAs to cut terms and conditions but to offer workplace flexibility and ensure continuity of supply.

“Employers were promised that IFAs would provide the same amount of flexibility for negotiating individual workplace arrangements. This is not the case.

“While 67 per cent of the mining industry was covered by AWAs at one point, and closer to 80 per cent in metalliferous mining, the take-up of IFAs is estimated to be considerably less than 5 per cent. In survey after survey our members tell us that IFAs are either of no value to them or of very little value.

“The other problem is that IFAs can be terminated with 28 days’ notice by either the employer or employee. This provides little incentive for employers to enter into them.

“The government is not expected to move on some of AREEAs recommendations to make IFAs more workable, such as making them a condition of employment, because they will begin to look more like the AWAs.

“However there is no reason why the government could not give greater security to both parties by enabling them to last for fixed terms of up to four years, and allowing for them to be terminated or
run for shorter terms by mutual agreement.”

For more information on IFAs read AREEA’s submission to Fair Work Australia’s review.

Click here to download a PDF of this media release.

Create your AREEA Member login

Register